HOME > BUSINESS > District Consumer Forum can take telecom cases: DoT

District Consumer Forum can take telecom cases: DoT

Bringing the promise of relief to millions of suffering telecom subscribers, the Department of Telecom today clarified that private companies do not enjoy any immunity from prosecution at district consumer forums as has been argued by them so far.

ncdrc_r1_c1

The Department of Telecom today said that private companies do not qualify under the definition of the Telegraph Authority of India given in the Telegraph Act.

Private telecom companies have so far successfully argued, based on a Supreme Court judgment, that they cannot be prosecuted in consumer forums as they represent the Telegraph Authority of India.

Their argument is based on a 2009 judgment by the Supreme Court which upheld Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd’s right to defend itself against consumer disputes using Section 7B of the Telegraph Act. Read Full SC judgment here

The Act says that any disputes between the telegraph authority and any consumer has to be resolved through arbitration and not through courts.

Section 7-B of the Telegraph Act reads as under S. 7B

Arbitration of Disputes :-

(1) Except as otherwise expressly provided in 3

this Act, if any dispute concerning any telegraph line, appliance or apparatus arises between the telegraph authority and the person or whose benefit the line, appliance or apparatus is, or has been provided, the dispute shall be determined by arbitration and shall, for the purpose of such determination, be referred to an arbitrator appointed by the Central Government either specifically for the determination of that dispute or generally for the determination of disputes under this Section.”

Based on this, a Supreme Court bench had ruled that any consumer dispute against BSNL has to be resolved through arbitration. Arbitration refers to the appointment of a mutually agreed legal expert or a committee of experts who hear both sides of a case and pronounce a judgment.

Many district forums have spoken out against the Supreme Court judgment.

For example, in an order in 2009, the district forum of Ferozepur said even the Supreme Court does not have the power to interpret laws contrary to their spirit.

“From the bare perusal of the above said Regulations framed by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India exercising the powers conferred upon it under Section 36 and Section 11 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, it is abundantly clear that the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 prevail over the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 and the jurisdiction and powers of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forums are over and above the jurisdiction and powers of the Tribunals established for the purpose of adjudication of disputes relating to telecommunication services,” it said.

“It is settled law that the law enacted by the Parliament cannot be changed or made useless by judicial interpretation. The provisions of the enactments have to prevail over the judicial decisions. The question of interpretation comes only when the provisions of legislative enactments are either not clear, ambiguous or cannot depict the true meaning. When the provisions of the legislative enactments are plain, clear and unambiguous, then these cannot be negtivated through judicial interpretation. Reliance can be placed upon various authorities of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on this point. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in “State of U.P. & Others Versus Jeet S. Bisht & Anr., 2007 (3) CLT 10”, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has specifically held that court cannot add or substitute word in a statute. By judicial verdict the court cannot amend the law made by the Parliament or State Legislature. It has been further held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the said authority that mere a direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court without laying down any principle of law is not a precedent. It is only where the Hon’ble Supreme Court lays down a principle of law that will amount to a precedent. The courts are subordinate to law and not above the law,” the district forum had said.

However, the Ferozepur forum was an isolated voice in a system where the Supreme Court judgment was held sacrosanct. The national consumer disputes redressal body, to which all appeals must ultimately go, too sided with the opinion that the Supreme Court’s judgment was to be upheld.

However, today, the DoT clarified that the power of Section 7B cannot be used by private companies as they do not have the power or functions of the telegraph authority. Their actions are entirely covered within the scope of the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum.

“The district consumer forums are competent to deal with the disputes between individual telecom consumers and telecom service providers,” the DoT said. Full order here

 

Follow ULTRA.news
Bharti Airtel is not the Telegraph Authority of India – Consumer Forum A district forum in Karnataka faulted Bharti Airtel Ltd for failing to convert a corporate mobile connection into a personal connection despite the ex-employee producing a no-objection certificate from his ex-employer. The Tumkur forum also dismissed Bharti Airtel's contention th...
Govt writes to district forums not to reject telecom complaints The government of India, through Ministry of Consumer Affairs, has written to all consumer disputes redressal bodies asking them not to reject consumer complaints against telecom operators as many of them have been doing for years.Consumer forums, including state-level bodies...
MNP fumble: Vodafone, Airtel told to compensate Kolkata resident Vodafone and Bharti Airtel have been told to compensate a customer after Vodafone disconnected a customer who ported from Airtel saying that the customer did not pay Airtel's bills. The North 24 Parganas district consumer forum found that Bharti Airtel guilty of issuing 'vague bi...
Builder argues real estate investment not covered under consumer law Giving relief to a builder, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has asked the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Forum to determine whether someone who buys a real estate property without the intention of living in it can be given protection under consumer laws.In a ca...
Karbonn Mobile to compensate after it runs out of stock for warranty replacement Karbonn Mobile has been told to pay Rs 5,000 as compensation and litigation expenses after the company said it no longer had a new handset to give to a customer whose handset stopped working properly during warranty time.The company was also told by the District Consumer ...
Ghaziabad consumer forum dismisses case against Bharti Airtel despite DoT clarification Despite repeated clarifications from the Central Government, a district consumer forum has dismissed a consumer complaint against Bharti Airtel Ltd and asked the consumer to set up arbitration against the telecom company to resolve a billing dispute of Rs 347.Arbitration pane...
Idea Cellular fined Rs 25,000 for deactivating SIM Idea Cellular Ltd, India's third biggest mobile company, has been fined Rs 25,000 for deactivating a SIM.Idea claimed that the connection was deactivated due to disuse, while the consumer, Anand Krishnan of Kasargod in Kerala, claimed that the number was in use regularly....
Bharti Airtel fined Rs 5 lakh for insensitive customer service A New Delhi consumer forum has imposed a fine of Rs 5 lakh on Bharti Airtel Ltd after the company continued to seek dues from a person even after the bill was paid.In a complaint by IT professional Jasmeet Singh Puri, the forum also expressed its consternation at the "lackada...
Builder Emaar MGF penalised for delay, deceptive practice Real Estate builder Emaar MGF has been penalized by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for "deceptive practice" for "mischievously and cleverly" not giving a fixed delivery date before taking 11 lakhs from the customer for plot in Mohali.The Commission fo...
Standard Chartered Bank fined for levying “minimum balance” charges Standard Chartered Bank has been told to pay two of its customers in India Rs 34,293.24 for levying 'minimum balance' charges on them without sufficient intimation.The bank had charged Rs.750, Rs.830 and Rs.830 to the accounts of Surinder Pal Arora and Nirmal Arora of Kirti N...
ICICI Bank told to pay Rs 50,000 for wrongly dishonoring cheque ICICI Bank Ltd has been asked to pay Rs 50,000 to a person whose cheque was wrongly rejected by the Bank despite his account having sufficient balance.The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission asked the bank to pay Rs 40,000 as compensation and Rs 10,000 as cost...
Dead insects in Fanta; Hindustan Coca-Cola to pay The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of India has dismissed an appeal by Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages, a part of The Coca-Cola Company’s Bottling Investments Group, against an order by a lower court awarding compensation to customer who found dead insects floating...
Consumer courts continue to dismiss telecom complaints despite Government clarification Despite a clarification by the Department of Telecom, several consumer  disputes redressal fora in India continue to reject billing and service related disputes against telecom operators.The Department of Telecom had issued a clarification on February 4 this year that private...